Re: A conversation between an atheist and a Christian |
From morbius@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu Sun May 14 23:26:04 EDT 1995 Article: 177661 of alt.atheism Path: newsfeed.pitt.edu!minerva!morbius From: morbius@minerva.phyast.pitt.edu (Edouard Morbius) Newsgroups: alt.atheism Subject: Re: A conversation between an atheist and a Christian Date: 15 May 1995 02:10:40 GMT Organization: Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Pittsburgh In article <3p0tlt$dki@urvile.MSUS.EDU> dheld@eeyore.stcloud.msus.edu (Lawnmower Man) writes: > Read it again. I said: "Nothing can pop into existence from nothing- >ness alone or uncaused." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >That means, if something has an *origin in time*, then it cannot be uncaused. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >If it *does not have an origin in time*, then it *cannot be caused*. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ While this statement is generally false, as I already mentioned in my reply to your post on virtual electron-positron pairs, if it is true with regard to the origin of the universe then it completely obliterates your argument that the universe *must* have a cause. Time is a part of the universe, so the universe cannot have an "origin in time", which presupposes that time exists *apart from* the universe and that the universe was created at some point *in* this time. So therefore, since the universe "*does not have an origin in time*, then it cannot be caused." Edouard Morbius